Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-22-Speech-2-268"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2005-02-22"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (komisjon)⁶
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050222.15.2-268"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-02-22-Speech-2-269⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Miroslav Ouzký⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@cs¹
lpv:spokenAs	vice-president; European Parliament (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)²² member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2009-07-13)²² substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)²²
lpv:translated text	"Spørgsmål nr. 50 af Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () I EU findes der forskellige bestemmelser om brugen af kørelys i dagtimerne, og i visse medlemsstater som f.eks. Sverige er brugen af kørelys obligatorisk på alle veje. Erfaringerne fra disse lande viser de store sikkerhedsmæssige fordele ved disse bestemmelser. Undersøgelser har vist, at antallet af færdselsulykker med personskade i dagtimerne falder med op til 24% gennem obligatorisk brug af kørelys. Jeg forstår, at det luxembourgske formandskab vil overvåge udviklingen i arbejdet med et direktiv om kørelys, og har derfor anmodet Kommissionen om at vedtage et forslag, som har været under udarbejdelse. Det forlyder imidlertid, at Kommissionen ville foretrække at udskyde vedtagelsen af dette forslag, indtil midtvejsvurderingen af det tredje færdselssikkerhedsprogram er offentliggjort, hvilket er berammet til juni. Kan Kommissionen bekræfte, at den har et sådant forslag under udarbejdelse, og at den vil vedtage det ufortøvet fremfor at afvente et andet dokuments færdiggørelse? Hvis man venter yderligere seks måneder med vedtagelsen, ville det ikke være i overensstemmelse med Kommissionens egen holdning til færdselssikkerhed gående ud på at acceptere delt an svar, da obligatorisk brug af kørelys har vist sig at være et yderst effektivt middel til at redde menneskeliv med lave omkostninger, og da Rådet ønsker fremskridt."@da² "Anfrage Nr. 50 von Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () In den Mitgliedstaaten der EU sind die Bestimmungen, Scheinwerfer auch am Tag einzuschalten, sehr unterschiedlich. In einigen Mitgliedstaaten, beispielsweise in Schweden, ist Abblendlicht am Tag auf allen Straßen Pflicht. Die Erfahrung in diesen Ländern zeigt die großen Sicherheitsvorteile, die diese Bestimmungen haben. Untersuchungen zufolge gab es aufgrund der Pflicht, auch bei Tag stets das Abblendlicht einzuschalten, bis zu 24 % weniger Straßenverkehrsunfälle. Offenbar möchte der luxemburgische Ratsvorsitz die Fortschritte in Bezug auf eine Richtlinie über Abblendlicht bei Tag überprüfen und hat daher die Kommission gebeten, einen Vorschlag anzunehmen, der sich bereits in Vorbereitung befindet. Angeblich zieht die Kommission es aber vor, die Annahme dieses Vorschlags bis zur Veröffentlichung der Halbzeitbilanz des dritten Straßenverkehrssicherheitsprogramms im Juni zu vertagen. Kann die Kommission bestätigen, dass sie einen solchen Vorschlag ausarbeitet und diesen Vorschlag dringlichst verabschieden wird, anstatt den Abschluss eines anderen Dossiers abzuwarten? Eine weitere Verzögerung um 6 Monate würde angesichts der Tatsache, dass die Abblendpflicht bei Tag nachweislich in vielen Fällen dazu geführt hat, Leben zu retten, nur geringe Kosten verursacht, sowie angesichts der Tatsache, dass der Ratsvorsitz Fortschritte möchte, nicht mit der Vorgehensweise der Kommission in Bezug auf Straßenverkehrssicherheit oder der Übernahme gemeinsamer Verantwortung in Einklang stehen."@de⁹ "Ερώτηση αριθ.50 της κ. Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Στο εσωτερικό της ΕΕ ισχύουν διάφορες διατάξεις για τη χρήση των φώτων πορείας την ημέρα: σε μερικά κράτη μέλη είναι υποχρεωτική σε όλους τους δρόμους, όπως για παράδειγμα, στη Σουηδία. Η εμπειρία στις χώρες αυτές κατέδειξε ότι η υποχρεωτική χρησιμοποίηση των φώτων αποτελεί παράγοντα ασφάλειας που, σύμφωνα με μελέτες, φτάνει έως και την κατά 24% μείωση των θανάτων. Απ’ ό,τι γνωρίζω, το Λουξεμβούργο που ασκεί την Προεδρία του Συμβουλίου, επιθυμεί να υπάρξει πρόοδος σχετικά με οδηγία για τη μόνιμη χρήση των φώτων πορείας και έχει ζητήσει από την Επιτροπή να εγκρίνει μία υπό εκπόνηση πρόταση. Παρ’ όλ’ αυτά, αναφέρθηκε ότι η Επιτροπή προτιμά να καθυστερήσει την έγκρισή της έως την ενδιάμεση αναθεώρηση του τρίτου προγράμματος για την οδική ασφάλεια που σχεδιάζεται για τον Ιούνιο. Μπορεί η Επιτροπή να επιβεβαιώσει ότι εκπονεί σχετική πρόταση και ότι θα εγκριθεί το δυνατόν συντομότερα και όχι μετά την ολοκλήρωση άλλου φακέλου; Μια αναμονή άλλων 6 μηνών, τη στιγμή που η υποχρεωτική χρήση των φώτων κατά τη διάρκεια της ημέρας έχει αποδειχθεί αποτελεσματικό μέτρο κατά της απώλειας ανθρώπινων ζωών, είναι χαμηλού κόστους και επικροτείται από την Προεδρία του Συμβουλίου, δεν είναι συνεπές με την προσέγγιση της ίδιας της Επιτροπής για την κοινή ευθύνη στον τομέα της οδικής ασφάλειας."@el¹⁰ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@en⁴ "Pregunta nº 50 formulada por Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () En la UE existen distintas disposiciones relativas a la utilización de las luces delanteras durante el día, y en algunos Estados miembros, por ejemplo en Suecia, las luces de día son obligatorias en todas las carreteras. La experiencia de estos países ilustra los enormes beneficios que representan estas disposiciones para la seguridad. Ciertos estudios demuestran que las luces de día pueden reducir las víctimas mortales en carretera en un 24 %. Al parecer, la Presidencia luxemburguesa del Consejo desea supervisar los progresos realizados en relación con una directiva sobre las luces de día, por lo que ha pedido a la Comisión que apruebe la propuesta que se ha estado elaborando. No obstante, se ha sugerido que la Comisión prefiere retrasar la aprobación de la propuesta hasta que se publique la evaluación intermedia sobre el tercer Programa de seguridad en carretera, prevista para junio. ¿Puede decir la Comisión si es cierto que se está elaborando dicha propuesta y si piensa aprobarla con la mayor urgencia en vez de esperar que se concluya otro expediente? Esperar otros seis meses cuando se sabe que las luces de día obligatorias son eficaces para salvar vidas, tienen costes bajos y la Presidencia del Consejo pide que se realicen progresos en este ámbito, no contribuiría a realizar el planteamiento de la propia Comisión en materia de seguridad en carretera, consistente en aceptar una responsabilidad compartida."@es²⁰ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@et⁵ "Kysymyksen nro 50 esittäjä Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () EU:n alueella sovelletaan erilaisia määräyksiä ajovalojen käytöstä päiväsaikaan, ja eräissä jäsenvaltioissa, kuten Ruotsissa, ajovaloja on käytettävä päiväsaikaan kaikilla maanteillä. Näistä maista saadut kokemukset osoittavat, että ajovalopakko kohentaa liikenneturvallisuutta huomattavasti. Tutkimuksissa on havaittu, että ajovalojen pakollinen käyttö päiväsaikaan vähentää päiväsaikaan tapahtuvia liikennekuolemia jopa 24 prosentilla. Neuvosto pyrkii käsittääkseni edistämään Luxemburgin puheenjohtajakaudella ajovalojen pakollista käyttöä päiväsaikaan koskevaa direktiiviä, ja se on pyytänyt komissiota hyväksymään valmisteltavana olleen ehdotuksen. Komission on kuitenkin kerrottu haluavan lykätä ehdotuksen hyväksymistä kunnes maantieliikenteen kolmannen turvallisuusohjelman väliarviointi on julkaistu (arviointi julkaistaan kesäkuussa). Voiko komissio vahvistaa, että se on valmistelemassa kyseistä ehdotusta ja että se hyväksytään erittäin kiireellisenä asiana sen sijaan, että odotettaisiin toisen aineiston valmistumista? Ajovalojen pakollinen käyttö päiväsaikaan on tunnetusti erittäin tehokas ihmishenkiä säästävä keino, josta ei aiheudu suuria kustannuksia ja lisäksi neuvoston puheenjohtaja haluaa asian etenevän. Kuuden kuukauden lisäodotus merkitsisi, että komissio laiminlyö oman jaettuun vastuuseen perustuvan lähestymistapansa liikenneturvallisuutta käsitellessään."@fi⁷ "J’appelle la question n° 50 de Mme Hedkvist Petersen (): Au sein de l’UE, l’utilisation des feux de jour fait l’objet de diverses dispositions et, dans quelques États membres, en Suède par exemple, l’allumage diurne des feux est obligatoire sur toutes les routes. L’expérience de ces pays montre les grands avantages que ces dispositions offrent en termes de sécurité. Selon certaines études, l’allumage obligatoire des feux en journée aurait permis de réduire jusqu’à 24% le nombre d’accidents de la route mortels qui surviennent de jour. Je crois savoir que la présidence luxembourgeoise souhaite encourager les progrès en vue de l’adoption d’une directive relative à l’allumage des feux de jour et qu’elle a donc invité la Commission à adopter une proposition qui est en préparation. Toutefois, d’aucuns prétendent que la Commission préférerait retarder l’adoption de cette proposition en attendant la publication du bilan à mi-parcours du troisième programme de sécurité routière prévu pour le mois de juin. La Commission peut-elle confirmer qu’elle est en train de préparer cette proposition et qu’elle l’adoptera au plus vite au lieu d’attendre la clôture d’un autre dossier? Attendre six mois de plus alors que l’on sait que l’allumage obligatoire des feux de croisement de jour est très efficace en termes de vies sauvées, qu’il a un faible coût et que la présidence du Conseil veut marquer des progrès en la matière, voilà qui ne serait pas conforme au principe de responsabilité partagée que la Commission défend en matière de sécurité routière."@fr⁸ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@hu¹¹ "Annuncio l’ interrogazione n. 50 dell’onorevole Ewa Hedkvist Petersen (): Nell’Unione europea sono in vigore diverse disposizioni sull’accensione dei fanali di segnalazione durante le ore diurne e in taluni Stati membri, come ad esempio in Svezia, tale accensione è obbligatoria su tutte le strade. L’esperienza accumulata in tali paesi evidenzia i notevoli vantaggi in termini di sicurezza derivanti da tale obbligo. Alcuni studi hanno dimostrato che l’obbligo dei fanali accesi anche durante il giorno ha ridotto del 24% il numero delle vittime di incidenti stradali avvenuti durante le ore diurne. La Presidenza lussemburghese del Consiglio, che sembrerebbe favorevole all’avanzamento dei lavori a una direttiva sull’obbligo dei fari accesi anche di giorno, ha pertanto invitato la Commissione ad adottare una proposta già in corso di elaborazione. Pare tuttavia che la Commissione preferisca rinviare l’approvazione della proposta in oggetto fino alla pubblicazione della revisione intermedia del Terzo programma sulla sicurezza stradale, prevista per giugno. Può la Commissione confermare che sta effettivamente lavorando a una tale proposta e che intende adottarla con la massima urgenza piuttosto che attendere la chiusura di un altro dossier? Attendere un altro semestre allorché è noto che l’obbligo dei fari accesi anche di giorno è uno strumento alquanto efficace per salvare la vita di molte persone, che comporta costi esigui e che la Presidenza del Consiglio si attende progressi, non sarebbe un atto conforme alla strategia della corresponsabilità, sostenuta dalla Commissione in materia di sicurezza stradale."@it¹² "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@lt¹⁴ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@lv¹³ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@mt¹⁵ "Vraag nr. 50 van mevrouw Hedkvist Petersen () In de EU bestaat een aantal regelingen voor het ontsteken van koplampen overdag, en in sommige lidstaten, bij voorbeeld Zweden, zijn overdag dimlichten verplicht op alle wegen. Uit de ervaring in deze landen blijken de grote veiligheidsvoordelen van deze bepalingen. Onderzoek toont aan dat het aantal dodelijke verkeersongevallen overdag met 24% is gedaald doordat overdag met dimlicht moet worden gereden. Naar ik verneem wenst het Luxemburgse voorzitterschap toe te zien op vooruitgang inzake een richtlijn met betrekking tot dimlicht overdag en derhalve is de Commissie verzocht een voorstel goed te keuren dat bij haar in voorbereiding is. Kennelijk geeft de Commissie er echter de voorkeur aan de goedkeuring van dit voorstel aan te houden totdat het tussentijds verslag van het derde programma veiligheid van het wegverkeer is gepubliceerd, dat voor juni op het programma staat. Kan de Commissie bevestigen dat zij een dergelijk voorstel voorbereidt en dat zij niet de voltooiing van het zoveelste dossier zal afwachten, maar het voorstel zo spoedig mogelijk zal goedkeuren? Als nog eens zes maanden wordt gewacht, terwijl bekend is dat licht overdag op zeer doelmatige wijze levens spaart, weinig kost, en dat het voorzitterschap van de Raad vooruitgang wenst, zou dit betekenen dat de Commissie niet te werk gaat volgens haar eigen aanpak van de veiligheid op de weg, namelijk aanvaarding van gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid."@nl³ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@pl¹⁶ "Pergunta nº 50, da deputada Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Existem, em toda a União Europeia, disposições muito diversas no que diz respeito à circulação dos veículos automóveis com as luzes acesas durante o dia. Em alguns Estados Membros, como é o caso da Suécia, por exemplo, circular com as luzes acesas durante o dia é obrigatório em qualquer tipo de via de circulação. A experiência obtida nestes países ilustra os enormes benefícios em matéria de segurança resultantes destas disposições. Há estudos que afirmam poder verificar se uma redução até 24% nos acidentes rodoviários ocorridos durante o dia devido à circulação obrigatória dos veículos automóveis com as luzes acesas. Chegou ao meu conhecimento que a Presidência do Conselho luxemburguesa deseja superintender a evolução de uma Directiva relativa à circulação obrigatória dos veículos automóveis com as luzes acesas durante o dia, tendo, por isso, solicitado à Comissão que apresente uma proposta nesse sentido. Essa proposta tem estado a ser preparada. Porém, circularam rumores de que a Comissão preferiria adiar a apresentação de uma tal proposta até à publicação do relatório intercalar sobre o Terceiro Programa de Segurança Rodoviária, em Junho deste ano. Poderá a Comissão confirmar o facto de ter a referida proposta em curso de preparação e de tencionar apresentá-la com a maior urgência, em vez de esperar pela conclusão de um outro dossier? Esperar mais seis meses quando se sabe que a circulação dos veículos automóveis com as luzes acesas durante o dia é uma determinação particularmente eficaz em salvar vidas, que ela tem custos baixos e que a Presidência do Conselho quer ver realizados progressos neste domínio, eis o que não se afigura conforme com o princípio da responsabilidade partilhada defendido pela própria abordagem da Comissão em matéria de segurança rodoviária."@pt¹⁷ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@sk¹⁸ "Question no 50 by Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () Different provisions exist across the EU for the use of headlights during the daytime, and in some Member States daytime running lights are mandatory on all roads, Sweden for example. The experience from these countries illustrates the great safety benefits these provisions deliver. Studies have found up to 24% reduction in daytime road fatalities due to mandatory daytime running lights. I understand the Luxembourg Presidency of the Council wishes to oversee progress on a directive on daytime running lights and has therefore requested the Commission to adopt a proposal that has been in preparation. However, suggestions have been made that the Commission would prefer to delay adopting this proposal until publication of the mid-term review of the third road safety programme due in June. Can the Commission confirm that it is preparing such a proposal and that it will adopt it with the utmost urgency rather than awaiting completion of another dossier? Waiting a further six months, when mandatory daytime running lights are known to be very effective in saving lives and have a low cost, and the Council Presidency wants progress, would not be fulfilling the Commission’s own approach to road safety of accepting a shared responsibility."@sl¹⁹ "Fråga nr 50 från Ewa Hedkvist Petersen () EU:s medlemsstater har olika bestämmelser om användning av halvljus/varselljus under dagtid. I vissa medlemsstater, bl.a. Sverige, är det obligatoriskt att använda halvljus/varselljus på alla vägar. Erfarenheterna från dessa länder visar att bestämmelserna leder till klart ökad säkerhet. Dessutom finns det studier som visar att trafikolyckorna under dagtid har minskat med hela 24 procent tack vare kravet på användning av halvljus/varselljus under dagtid. Vad jag förstår har det luxemburgiska ordförandeskapet för avsikt att se över arbetet med ett direktiv om användning av halvljus/varselljus under dagtid. Jag har även fått intrycket att man uppmanat kommissionen att anta det förslag som utarbetats. Det tycks dock som om kommissionen skulle föredra att vänta med att anta detta förslag tills halvtidsutvärderingen av det tredje vägtrafiksäkerhetsprogrammet offentliggörs i juni. Kan kommissionen bekräfta att man håller på att utarbeta ett förslag i detta ämne och att man snarast kommer att anta det, utan att vänta på att ytterligare en utvärdering slutförs? Vi vet att man genom att införa krav på användning av halvljus/varselljus under dagtid skulle rädda många liv till en liten kostnad. Vi vet också att rådets ordförandeskap vill se framsteg i denna fråga. Om kommissionen väntar ytterligare sex månader med att anta förslaget skulle man motarbeta sin egen strategi, som bygger på att trafiksäkerheten är ett gemensamt an svar."@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Aihe: Ehdotus direktiiviksi ajovalojen pakollisesta käytöstä päiväsaikaan"⁷ "Angående: Förslag till direktiv om obligatorisk användning av halvljus/varselljus under dagtid"²¹ "Assunto: Proposta de directiva relativa à circulação obrigatória dos veículos automóveis com as luzes acesas durante o dia"¹⁷ "Asunto: Propuesta de directiva sobre la obligación de utilizar luces de día"²⁰ "Betreft: Voorstel voor een richtlijn inzake verplicht dimlicht overdag"³ "Betrifft: Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie über zwingend vorgeschriebenes Abblendlicht am Tag"⁹ "De Voorzitter."³ "Der Präsident."⁹ "El Presidente."²⁰ "Formanden."² "Le Président. -"⁸ "Objet: Proposition de directive relative à l’allumage obligatoire des feux de croisement de jour"⁸ "Oggetto: Proposta di direttiva sull’obbligo dei fanali accesi durante il giorno"¹² "Om: Forslag til direktiv om obligatorisk brug af kørelys"² "President."^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "Presidente."^17,12 "Puhemies."⁷ "Subject: Proposal for a directive on mandatory daytime running lights"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "Talmannen."²¹ "Θέμα: Πρόταση οδηγίας για υποχρεωτική χρήση των φώτων πορείας των αυτοκινήτων κατά τη διάρκεια της ημέρας"¹⁰ "Πρόεδρος."¹⁰