Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2005-02-22-Speech-2-256"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech⁶
dcterms:Date	"2005-02-22"^^xsd:date⁶
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Infotund (komisjon)⁶
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language⁶
lpv:document identification number	"en.20050222.15.2-256"⁶
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2005-02-22-Speech-2-257⁶
lpv:speaker	lp:Miroslav Ouzký⁶
lpv:spoken text	"Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@cs¹
lpv:spokenAs	vice-president; European Parliament (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)²² member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2009-07-13)²² substitute; AFET (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² substitute; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2004-09-15--2007-03-13)²² unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)²² member; ENVI (2004-07-21--2007-01-14)²² vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2004-07-20--2007-01-15)²²
lpv:translated text	"Spørgsmål nr. 47 af Dimitrios Papadimoulis () I sit forslag til direktiv om havnetjenester (KOM(2004)0654 /endel.) definerer Kommissionen tydeligere end tidligere, hvordan begrebet "selvservicering" skal forstås og praktiseres. Til trods for dette har store organisationer såsom Det Europæiske Transportarbejderforbund og Den Europæiske Havneorganisation udtrykt frygt for, at det vil komme til sociale uroligheder i havnene, afskrækkelse af investorer og følgelig mindsket konkurrenceevne. Hvad er Kommissionens reaktion på fagforeningernes bekymring, og hvordan agter Kommissionen at sikre, at de arbejdstagere, der allerede er registrerede medlemmer af fagforeningerne, ikke vil blive udsat for diskrimination med nedsat beskæftigelse og indkomsttab til følge? Hvordan vil Kommissionen reagere på de ovennævnte faglige organisationers påpegelse af, at bestemmelsen om "selvservicering" ikke stemmer overens med ILO-konvention 137 om havnearbejde?"@da² "Anfrage Nr. 47 von Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In dem Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie über Hafendienste (KOM(2004)0654 /endg.) schreibt die Kommission genauer als in der Vergangenheit den Begriff und die Anwendung des Grundsatzes der „Selbstabfertigung“ fest. Dennoch sind seitens der Europäischen Transportarbeiter-Föderation und der Europäischen Organisation der Seehäfen große Besorgnisse darüber laut geworden, dass es zu sozialen Unruhen in den Häfen, zu einer Entmutigung möglicher Investoren und folglich zu einem Rückgang der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit kommen könnte. Wie reagiert die Kommission auf diese Besorgnisse der Föderationen und wie gedenkt sie sicherzustellen, dass den Gewerkschaften angehörende Arbeiter nicht diskriminiert werden, indem ihnen schließlich Arbeitsstunden und Löhne gekürzt werden? Wie reagiert die Kommission auf den Hinweis der oben genannten Gewerkschaftsorganisationen bezüglich der Nichtvereinbarkeit der Bestimmung über die „Selbstabfertigung“ mit der ILO-Vereinbarung 137 betreffend Hafenarbeit?"@de⁹ "Ερώτηση αριθ.47 του κ. Δημητρίου Παπαδημούλη () Στην πρόταση οδηγίας για τις λιμενικές υπηρεσίες (COM(2004)0654 /τελικό), η Επιτροπή ορίζει ευκρινέστερα από ό,τι στο παρελθόν, τον όρο και την εφαρμογή της «ίδιας διαχείρισης». Παρόλα αυτά όμως, μεγάλες οργανώσεις όπως η Ευρωπαϊκή Ομοσπονδία Εργατών Μεταφορών και η Ευρωπαϊκή Οργάνωση Θαλασσίων Λιμένων, εκφράζουν ανησυχίες για την πιθανότητα κοινωνικών αναταραχών στα λιμάνια, την αποθάρρυνση πιθανών επενδυτών και κατά συνέπεια, τη μείωση της ανταγωνιστικότητας. Ποια είναι η απάντηση της Επιτροπής στις ανησυχίες των συνδικάτων και πώς σκοπεύει η Επιτροπή να διασφαλίσει ότι οι εργαζόμενοι ήδη μέλη συνδικάτων δεν θα υποστούν διακρίσεις με τελικό αποτέλεσμα τη μείωση της απασχόλησης και του εισοδήματος τους; Επίσης ποια είναι η απάντηση της Επιτροπής στην καταγγελία από τις παραπάνω συνδικαλιστικές οργανώσεις για ασυμβατότητα της διάταξης «ίδιας διαχείρισης» με τη Σύμβαση 137 της Διεθνούς Οργάνωσης Εργασίας αναφορικά με τη λιμενική εργασία;"@el¹⁰ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@en⁴ "Pregunta nº 47 formulada por Dimitrios Papadimoulis () En la propuesta de directiva sobre el acceso al mercado de los servicios portuarios (COM(2004)0654 /final), la Comisión intenta definir con mayor precisión que en el pasado el concepto de "igualdad de trato" y su aplicación. A pesar de ello, importantes organizaciones como la Federación Europea de los Trabajadores del Transporte y la Organización Europea de Puertos Marítimos han manifestado su preocupación ante la posibilidad de que se produzcan perturbaciones sociales en los puertos, se desaliente a los posibles inversores y, consecuentemente, se reduzca la competencia. ¿Qué respuesta da la Comisión a las preocupaciones de los sindicatos? ¿Cómo piensa garantizar que los trabajadores ya afiliados a un sindicato no sean objeto de discriminaciones que puedan dar lugar a una reducción de puestos de trabajo y de sus ingresos? ¿Cuál es, en particular, su respuesta ante la denuncia hecha por las organizaciones sindicales antes mencionadas de que el concepto de "igualdad de trato" es incompatible con la Convención 137 de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo sobre el trabajo portuario?"@es^20,20 "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@et⁵ "Kysymyksen nro 47 esittäjä Dimitrios Papadimoulis () Satamapalveluja koskevassa direktiiviehdotuksessaan (KOM(2004)0654 /lopullinen) komissio antaa tähän asti selkeimmän määritelmän omahuolinnasta ja sen soveltamisesta. Tästä huolimatta monet suuret järjestöt, kuten Euroopan kuljetustyöntekijöiden liitto ja Euroopan satamayhteisö, ovat huolissaan sosiaalisten häiriöiden mahdollisuudesta satamissa, mahdollisten investoijien kaikkoamisesta sekä tästä johtuvasta kilpailukyvyn laskusta. Mitä komissio vastaa ammattijärjestöjen huolenaiheisiin ja kuinka se aikoo taata, että ammattiliittoihin jo kuuluvat työntekijät eivät joudu sellaisen syrjinnän kohteeksi, joka saattaa johtaa heidän työllisyysnäkymiensä ja palkkansa alenemiseen? Kuinka komissio aikoo vastata edellä mainittujen ammattijärjestöjen väitteeseen siitä, että omahuolintalauseke on ristiriidassa Kansainvälisen työjärjestön satamatyötä koskevan yleissopimuksen nro 137 kanssa?"@fi⁷ "J’appelle la question n° 47 de M. Papadimoulis (): S’agissant de la directive sur les services portuaires, le texte proposé par la Commission (COM(2004)0654 /final) définit de façon plus détaillée que dans le passé l’expression «autoassistance» et son application. Il n’en demeure pas moins que d’importantes organisations telles que la Fédération européenne des employés des transports et l’Organisation européenne des ports maritimes se déclarent préoccupées par l’apparition éventuelle de troubles sociaux dans les ports, par la démotivation des investisseurs éventuels et, partant, par une baisse de la compétitivité. Quelle est la réponse de la Commission aux inquiétudes manifestées par les syndicats et comment compte-t-elle donner aux travailleurs d’ores et déjà syndiqués l’assurance qu’ils ne feront pas l’objet de discriminations qui pourraient déboucher, en dernière analyse, sur une baisse de l’emploi et de leurs revenus? Quelle est, également, la réponse de la Commission aux organisations syndicales qui dénoncent le fait que la disposition relative à «l’autoassistance» est incompatible avec la Convention 137 de l’Organisation internationale du travail concernant la manutention portuaire?"@fr⁸ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@hu¹¹ "Annuncio l’ interrogazione n. 47 dell’onorevole Dimitrios Papadimoulis (): Nella proposta di direttiva sull’accesso al mercato dei servizi portuali (COM(2004)0654 /def.) la Commissione tenta di definire in materia più chiara rispetto al passato il concetto di “parità di trattamento” e la sua applicazione. Ciò nonostante, grandi organizzazioni come la Confederazione europea dei lavoratori dei trasporti e la Organizzazione europea dei porti marittimi esprimono le loro inquietudini quanto alla probabilità di perturbazioni sociali nei porti, lo scoraggiamento di possibili investitori e, di conseguenza, la riduzione della competitività. Quale risposta dà la Commissione alle inquietudini dei sindacati e come intende assicurare che i lavoratori già iscritti nei sindacati non subiranno discriminazioni suscettibili di culminare con la riduzione dell’occupazione e la contrazione del reddito? Inoltre, qual è la risposta della Commissione all’accusa rivoltale dalle organizzazioni sindacali di cui sopra circa l’incompatibilità della disposizione relativa alla “parità di trattamento” con la Convenzione 137 dell’Organizzazione internazionale del lavoro riguardante il lavoro portuale?"@it¹² "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@lt¹⁴ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@lv¹³ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@mt¹⁵ "Vraag nr. 47 van de heer Papadimoulis () In haar voorstel voor een richtlijn inzake havendiensten definieert de Commissie (COM(2004)0654 /def.) nog preciezer dan in het verleden de term en de toepassing van "zelfafhandeling". Toch maken grote organisaties zoals de Europese federatie van transportarbeiders en de Europese organisatie voor zeehavens zich zorgen over mogelijke sociale onrust in de havens, het afschrikken van mogelijke investeerders en de daarmee gepaard gaande vermindering van het concurrentievermogen. Wat is de reactie van de Commissie op deze bezorgdheid van de syndicaten en hoe denkt zij ervoor te zorgen dat de werknemers die reeds zijn aangesloten bij een vakbond, niet het slachtoffer worden van discriminatie met werk- en inkomensverlies tot gevolg? Wat is het antwoord van de Commissie op de beschuldiging van de hoger genoemde vakbondsorganisaties dat de bepaling inzake "zelfafhandeling" in strijd is met Overeenkomst 137 van de Internationale Arbeidsorganisatie inzake havenarbeid?"@nl³ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@pl¹⁶ "Pergunta nº 47, do deputado Dimitrios Papadimoulis () Na Proposta de Directiva relativa ao acesso ao mercado dos serviços portuários (COM(2004)0654 /final) a Comissão define com maior precisão que no passado a expressão "auto prestação" e a sua aplicação. Apesar disso, no entanto, grandes organizações como a Federação Europeia dos Trabalhadores dos Transportes e a Organização Europeia dos Portos Marítimos manifestam a sua preocupação perante a possibilidade de perturbações sociais nos portos, o desencorajamento de eventuais investidores e, portanto, de redução da competitividade. Qual a resposta da Comissão às preocupações dos sindicatos e como tenciona confirmar que os trabalhadores já inscritos nos sindicatos não serão objecto de discriminação tendo por objectivo final a redução das suas perspectivas de emprego e de rendimento? Pergunta-se igualmente à Comissão como responde à denúncia feita pelas organizações sindicais supracitadas de incompatibilidade da disposição "auto prestação" com a Convenção 137 da OIT relativamente ao trabalho portuário?"@pt¹⁷ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@sk¹⁸ "Question no 47 by Dimitrios Papadimoulis () In its proposal for a directive on port services (COM(2004)0654 /final), the Commission provides its clearest definition to date of the term and application of 'self-handling'. Despite this, major organisations, such as the European Transport Workers' Federation and the European Sea Ports Organisation, are concerned about the likelihood of social unrest in ports, the discouragement of potential investors and the ensuing decline in competitiveness. What is the Commission's response to the concerns of the trade unions and how does it intend to ensure that workers already registered with trade unions will not suffer any discrimination, resulting ultimately in a reduction in their employment prospects and income? Furthermore, how does the Commission respond to the charge by the above trade union organisations that the 'self-handling' provision is incompatible with ILO Convention 137 on cargo handling in docks?"@sl¹⁹ "Fråga nr 47 från Dimitrios Papadimoulis () I förslaget till direktiv om tillträde till marknaden för hamntjänster definierar kommissionen denna gång (KOM(2004)0654 ) klarare än tidigare termen och tillämpningen ”lika behandling”. Trots detta varnar dock stora organisationer som Europeiska transportarbetarfederationen och Europeiska hamnorganisationen för att det kan uppstå konflikter mellan olika grupper i hamnarna samt för att eventuella investerare kan bli avskräckta och konkurrenskraften följaktligen minska. Hur reagerar kommissionen på fackföreningarnas oro och på vilket sätt tänker den garantera att de arbetare som redan är anslutna till fackföreningarna inte skall utsättas för diskriminering, vilket i slutändan leder till minskad sysselsättning och lägre inkomster? Hur reagerar kommissionen vidare på ovannämnda fackorganisationers påstående att bestämmelsen ”lika behandling” och ILO:s konvention 137 om arbete i hamnar är oförenliga?"@sv²¹
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Aihe: Satamapalveluja koskeva direktiiviehdotus"⁷ "Angående: Förslag till direktiv om hamntjänster"²¹ "Assunto: Proposta de Directiva sobre os serviços portuários"¹⁷ "Asunto: Propuesta de directiva sobre servicios portuarios"²⁰ "Betreft: Voorstel voor een richtlijn inzake havendiensten"³ "Betrifft: Vorschlag für eine Richtlinie über Hafendienste"⁹ "De Voorzitter."³ "Der Präsident."⁹ "El Presidente."²⁰ "Formanden."² "Le Président. -"⁸ "Objet: Proposition de directive sur les services portuaires"⁸ "Oggetto: Proposta di direttiva sui servizi portuali"¹² "Om: Forslag til direktiv om havnetjenester"² "President."^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "Presidente."^17,12 "Puhemies."⁷ "Subject: Proposal for a directive for port services"^{5,19,15,1,18,14,16,11,13,4} "Talmannen."²¹ "Θέμα: Πρόταση Οδηγίας για τις Λιμενικές Υπηρεσίες"¹⁰ "Πρόεδρος."¹⁰